Part A - Evaluative Statement
The evaluation of the content covered in the modules needs to cover various areas and is not limited to the exposure to new social networking tools. As a result there is only one tool that is evaluated in this report as it is the most relevant one to solve the current communication challenge that is facing the school (Doyle, 2013 April 21). In addition to the social networking tools themselves, it is important to examine the associated issues related to this technology. The first one is examining the different engagement levels and roles in using this technology as it has definite consequences for the success of their adoption. Finally, the issue of information validity must be examined as it is an issue that is facing educators worldwide and is directly related to the redefinition of information that social networking has caused.
A range of tools were trialled during module 2. RSS is the tool that proved to be the most relevant to solve a communication problem at our school. RSS, Rich Site Summary, is a way to distribute changing web content which is used by many news servers as well as blogs (Attitude Group Ltd, n.d.). It enables people to easily stay up to date with a variety of news and other information sources. It means that people do not have to actually visit every site to get this information, but get it all delivered to them courtesy of a RSS feed reader (Murley, 2009).
An RSS feed is a tool that could begin in the library as a way to stay in touch with clients. As this tool is gaining wider use in the community as a way for them to stay up to date with news sources, applying the use of this tool for library news would not be a substantial time investment for parents. Ultimately, with evidence of success, it is a tool that could gain wider use by the school community. Our school newsletter is a common topic of discussion in regards to whether it serves its purpose, or whether there is a communication tool that would be more effective (Doyle, 2013 April 21). Providing an RSS feed to parents so that they can stay up to date with school news could be an appropriate alternative to the traditional newsletter.
The Boston school example (Doyle, 2013 April 21) shows how multiple feeds can be used to serve a variety of purposes. In this case there were separate feeds for news, events and alerts. Similarly, an individual school could also offer a number of feeds, including one that offers library news. In addition to this, there could be a connection to the school calendar, as shown by the example with Rosalie School, that has a separate RSS feed for their calendar (Doyle, 2013 April 21).
The research conducted by Bernoff (2012) that was explored during Module 4 was an interesting examination of the social media roles that people adopt. While it seems a simple categorisation of the way people view or interact online, it has implications for any social media strategy that could be employed. If a strategy was dependent on large scale active participation, then there would be a risk that it would not be successful since the research shows that a large proportion of users prefer to take an observer role (Doyle. 2013 May 6).
This result from the research also needs to be considered in regards to the use of this technology with children as a part of learning. If a large majority are comfortable simply to operate the applications as observers, there will not be the level of collaboration that may have been hoped for. The challenge for a teacher or teacher-librarian is to determine if there are any barriers to participation for these users and whether the removal of these barriers would result in different levels of active participation. In addition, it is unclear whether the results of Bernoff (2012) equate to the same numbers when considering child users of the technology. Children are naturally more adept and confident with using new applications and may deliver different results if they were the focus of this study.
In module 5, the issue of finding authentic information in a socially networked world was explored. The growth in use of social networking has meant not only a higher level of access to information, but the ability to be a creator of information. The collaborative nature of applications such as wikis and blogs means that more people than ever before are creating content. The problem for educators is that information that in the past would have to pass through editors and publishers before being accessible on a shelf to students is now undergoing very little scrutiny before being available for viewing by students who report it as fact (Lorenzo, 2007). The greatest challenge in gaining the most value from this collaboration is teaching students how to determine the validity of the information they are viewing. Lorenzo (2007) believes that we too quickly mistake students’ technologically savvy confidence for the ability to distinguish the different between quality information and misinformation.
Part B - Reflective Statement
My evolution in thinking from the beginning of the session to now is dramatic. My original definition of my understanding of social networking and its reach within an information agency was grossly limited. The initial post that I made during this subject was limited to the perspective of a user (Doyle, 2013, March 9). The growth in understanding that has resulted has led to the realisation of the extent to which these tools can be harnessed as a facilitator or creator of content. While there has been the addition of new, useful tools that can be used by students to build collaboration and communication, there has also been the opportunity to harness this technology as a way to build upon the library’s services, develop promotional strategies and most importantly in 21st century education, maintain relevancy.
Kelly (2009, March 10) raised an interesting idea, suggesting that individuals have the choice whether or not they adopt a certain technology or application. Presently, you can make the decision whether to participate in Facebook, for example. However, this subject itself proves this point wrong and suggests that opting out of social networking is becoming increasingly difficult. Since the forum for this subject was run as a Facebook group, it meant that everyone undertaking this subject had to be a member of Facebook. Similarly to this example, there are more instances where social networking is becoming a requirement rather a choice (Doyle, 2013, April 20). If this is the current growing expectation in the professional world, then the world that will greet our students is one that will have a more complex weaving of online and offline worlds. Therefore, it becomes the responsibility of the educational system to prepare students for this connected world.
In a school setting, it is vital that any new initiative or tool that is introduced for staff use is one where the benefit will clearly outweigh the cost and effort. Forcing a new program onto a staff can be an unpredictable process (Wizenried, 2010). However, for teachers it is no longer acceptable to opt out of technology, or simply rely on colleagues to complete any computer related task on your behalf. We have gone from learning to use technology, to using technology to learn. Any teacher or teacher-librarian who ignores the latest advances in social networking technology as a tool to learn, collaborate and communicate are doing themselves as well as their class and school as disservice.
As with the introduction of any new technology, policy development must grow at the same rate. At RHS our current Acceptable Use of Technology agreement that is signed by students and parents does not take into account participation in social media. A revision of this document through consultation with the various stakeholders is necessary to ensure we are sufficiently regulating the use of these tools.
The role of the teacher-librarian as a facilitator and possible champion of this technology is going to be multi faceted. While the obvious avenue is educating the staff and students alike about the technical requirements of using this technology, the larger issue of pioneering a shift in thinking is the more complicated role. This involves redefining how we see information, not as a static fact but rather an evolving idea that can develop through collaboration and discussion.
A change in approach is required in regards to facilitating research for students. The process for conducting research at my school remains the same as when I was in primary school, except the source of information is usually the internet instead of books. However, such a dramatic change in source requires a definite need for a change in approach. Information is now up for debate and critical literacy skills are becoming a vital requirement for the 21st century student. The future challenge is to redefine our roles in education so that we are teaching the skills to distinguish quality information, rather than acting as the delivery system, so that the top ranked result on Google is not automatically praised by all as the ultimate holder of knowledge (Wittenburg, 2007; Garfinkel, 2008).
This subject has challenged my thinking more than any other that I have participated in so far. The initial expectation that I would be an expert in this area was swiftly challenged as I found a whole arena of new ideas and interesting discussion points about the future of information. The collaborative nature of social networking and the creation of content means that the definition of information has been altered. Therefore, our approach to teaching and learning is also experiencing a dramatic shift that needs to be managed effectively so that teachers and teacher librarians are not left behind.
Reference List
Attitude Group Ltd. (n.d) What is RSS? Retrieved at: http://www.whatisrss.com/
Bernoff, J. (2012). The Global Social Takeover [January 4]. Retrieved from: http://forrester.typepad.com/groundswell/2012/01/the-global-social-takeover.html
Doyle, P. (2013, April 20). INF506 Module One thoughts ethnic technology [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://pendoyle.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/module-one-thoughts-ethnic-technology.html
Doyle, P. (2013, April 20). INF506- Module 2 – Blogs etc – Possible communication solution + OLJ activities [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://pendoyle.blogspot.com.au/2013/04/inf506-module-2-blogs-etc-possible.html
Doyle, P. (2013, May 2). INF506- Module 3 – Library 2.0 OLJ activity [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://pendoyle.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/inf506-module-3-library-20-olj-activity.html
Doyle, P. (2013, May 6). INF506- Module 4 – Making web 2.0 work [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://pendoyle.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/inf506-module-4-making-web-20-work.html
Doyle, P. (2013, May 11). INF506- Module 4 – Making web 2.0 work [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://pendoyle.blogspot.com.au/2013/05/inf506-module-5-social-networking-and.html
Garfinkel, S. (2008). Wikipedia and the meaning of truth. Technology Review, 111(6), 84-86. Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com
Kelly, K. (2009, March 10) Ethnic Technology [Blog Post].
Retrieved from: http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2009/03/ethnic_technolo.php
Lorenzo, G. (2007). Catalysts for change: Information fluency, Web 2.0, Library 2.0, and the new education culture. (March). Retrieved from http://www.edpath.com/images/IFReport2.pdfDoyle, P. (2013, March 9). INF506 First Post [Blog Post]. Retrieved from: http://pendoyle.blogspot.com.au/2013/03/inf506-first-post.html
Murley, D. (2009). The power of RSS Feeds. Law Library Journal, 101(1), 127-135. Retrieved from http://www.aallnet.org/main-menu/Publications/llj/LLJ-Archives/Vol-101/pub_llj_v101n01/2009-08.pdf
Wittenberg, K. (2007). Credibility of content and the future of research, learning, and publishing in the digital environment. The Journal of Electornic Publishing, 10(1). Retrieved from: http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=jep;cc=jep;rgn=main;view=text;idno=3336451.0010.101
Winzenried, A. (2010). Visionary leaders for information. Centre for information studies, Charles Sturt University: Wagga Wagga.